Pages

Tuesday, August 14, 2012

RECOMMENDED PAY SCALES BY COMMITTEE OF SECRETARIES

 
RECOMMENDED PAY SCALES- TABULATED- FOR EASY REFERENCE

RECOMMENDED PAY SCALES: watch out on 15 AUG 2012 ?

   Inbox 

Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 9:03 AM


RECOMMENDED PAY SCALES: SENT TO PM TM ALL CHIEFS & AGENCIES INVOLVED

LT [Equivalent to IAS Junior Scale Pay Band: Rs  15600-39100Grade Pay Rs 5400]

Pre-revised scale: 8250-300-10050Revised Pay Bank PB-3 +Grade Pay + MSP: 15600-39100 + 5400 + 6000

Pre-revised Basic Pay
Revised Pay
Pay in the scale
Rank Pay

Pay in the Pay Band
Grade Pay
Military Service Pay
Total Revised Pay
8250
0

15600
5400
6000
27000
8550
0

15910
5400
6000
27310
8850
0

16470
5400
6000
27870
9150
0

17020
5400
6000
28420
9450
0

17580
5400
6000
28980
9750
0

18140
5400
6000
29540
10050
0

18700
5400
6000
30100
10350
0

19260
5400
6000
30660
10650
0

19810
5400
6000
31210
10950
0

20370
5400
6000
31770

CAPT [Lower to Senior Time Scale Pay Band: Rs  15600-39100 Grade Pay Rs 6600

An IAS Officer is promoted to the Senior Time Scale usually after 7-9 years of service]

Pre-revised scale: 8250-300-10050Revised Pay Bank PB-3 +Grade Pay + MSP: 15600-39100 + 5400 + 6000

Pre-revised Basic Pay
Revised Pay
Pay in the scale
Rank Pay

Pay in the Pay Band
Grade Pay
Military Service Pay
Total Revised Pay
9600
400

18600
6100
6000
30700
9900
400

19160
6100
6000
31260
10200
400

19720
6100
6000
31820
10500
400

20280
6100
6000
32380
10800
400

20840
6100
6000
32940
11100
400

21390
6100
6000
33490
11400
400

21950
6100
6000
34050
11700
400

22510
6100
6000
34610
12000
400

23070
6100
6000
35170
12300
400

23630
6100
6000
35730
MAJ [Equivalent to IASSenior Time Scale  Pay Band: Rs  15600-39100 Grade Pay Rs 6600 An IAS Officer is promoted to the Senior Time Scale usually after 7-9 years of service\
Pre-revised scale: 11600-325-14850 Revised Pay Bank PB-3 +Grade Pay + MSP: 15600-39100 + 6600 + 6000

Pre-revised Basic Pay
Revised Pay
Pay in the scale
Rank Pay

Pay in the Pay Band
Grade Pay
Military Service Pay
Total Revised Pay
11600
1200

23810
6600
6000
36410
11925
1200

24420
6600
6000
37020
12250
1200

25020
6600
6000
37620
12575
1200

25630
6600
6000
38230
12900
1200

26230
6600
6000
38830
13225
1200

26840
6600
6000
39440
13550
1200

27440
6600
6000
40040
13875
1200

28040
6600
6000
40640
14200
1200

28650
6600
6000
41250
14525
1200

29250
6600
6000
41850
14850
1200

29860
6600
6000
42460
15175
1200

30460
6600
6000
43060
15500
1200

31070
6600
6000
43670
15825
1200

31670
6600
6000
44270
  

LT COL [TS] [Equivalent to IAS Junior Administrative Grade Pay Band: Rs  15600-39100 Grade Pay Rs 7600

Pre-revised scale: 13500-400-17100Revised Pay Bank PB-4 +Grade Pay + MSP: 37400-67000 + 8000 + 6000
Pre-revised Basic Pay
Revised Pay
Pay in the scale
Rank Pay

Pay in the Pay Band
Grade Pay
Military Service Pay
Total Revised Pay
13500
1600

28090
8000
6000
41690
13900
1600

28830
8000
6000
42430
14300
1600

29580
8000
6000
43180
14700
1600

30320
8000
6000
43920
15100
1600

31070
8000
6000
44670
15500
1600

31810
8000
6000
45410
15900
1600

32550
8000
6000
46150
16300
1600

33300
8000
6000
46900
16700
1600

34040
8000
6000
47640
17100
1600

34790
8000
6000
48390
17500
1600

35530
8000
6000
49130
17900
1600

36270
8000
6000
49870

LT COL [SELECTION] [Equal to IAS Selection Grade Pay Band: Rs  37400-67000 Grade Pay Rs 8700]

Pre-revised scale: 15100-450-17350Revised Pay Bank PB-4 +Grade Pay + MSP: 37400-67000 + 8700 + 6000
Pre-revised Basic Pay
Revised Pay
Pay in the scale
Rank Pay

Pay in the Pay Band
Grade Pay
Military Service Pay
Total Revised Pay
15100
2000

40890
8700
6000
55590
15550
2000

40890
8700
6000
55590
16000
2000

42120
8700
6000
56820
16450
2000

42120
8700
6000
56820
16900
2000

43390
8700
6000
58090
17350
2000

43390
8700
6000
58090
17800
2000

44700
8700
6000
59400
18250
2000

44700
8700
6000
59400
18700
2000

46050
8700
6000
60750

COL [TS] [Equivalent to IAS Selection Grade Pay Band: Rs 37400-67000 Grade Pay Rs 8700]


TO BRIG PAY BAND SCALE
[BULK OF ARMY OFFICER RETIRE UPTO THIS RANK]

AS POLICE DIG IS NOW PLACED IN THIS SCALE, BUT IPS RETIRES AS IGP MUCH HIGHER GRADE, SO IS IAS
[DIG RANK IS ACHIEVED IN 14 YEARS BUT COL [TS] IN 26 YEARS]
Pre-revised scale: 16700-450-18050Revised Pay Bank PB-4 +Grade Pay + MSP: 37400-67000 + 8900 + 6000
Pre-revised Basic Pay
Revised Pay
Pay in the scale
Rank Pay

Pay in the Pay Band
Grade Pay
Military Service Pay
Total Revised Pay
15100
2000

40890
8700
6000
55590
15550
2000

42120
8700
6000
56820
16000
2000

42120
8700
6000
56820
16450
2000

43390
8700
6000
58090
16900
2000

43390
8700
6000
58090
17350
2000

44700
8700
6000
59400
17800
2000

44700
8700
6000
59400
18250
2000

46050
8700
6000
60750
18700
2000

46050
8700
6000
60750
COL[S] & BRIG TO BE PLACED IN MAJ GEN PAY BAND SCALE
Pre-revised scale: 18400-500-22400 [SPLIT SCALES IN TWO EQUAL HALVESRevised Pay Bank PB-4 +Grade Pay + MSP: 37400-67000 + 10000
[BULK OF IAS & IPS RETIRE IN THIS GRADE]

COL [SELECTION] [Equivalent to IAS Pre-revised scale: 18400-500-22400 Super Time Scale Pay Band: Rs  37400-67000 Grade Pay Rs 10000]

Revised Pay Bank PB-4 +Grade Pay + MSP: 37400-67000 + 10000
Pre-revised Basic Pay
Revised Pay
Pay in the scale
Rank Pay
 Pay in the Pay Band
National benefit of MSP*
Total Pay in Pay Band
Grade Pay
Total Revised Pay
18400

44700
6000
50700
10000
60700
18900

46050
6000
52050
10000
62050
19400

46050
6000
52050
10000
62050
19900

47440
6000
53440
10000
63440
20400

47440
6000
53440
10000
63440
20900

48870
6000
54870
10000
64870
21400

48870
6000
54870
10000
64870
21900

50340
6000
56340
10000
66340

BRIG [Equivalent to IAS Super Time Scale Pay Band: Rs  37400-67000 Grade Pay Rs 10000]

Pre-revised scale: 18400-500-22400Revised Pay Bank PB-4 +Grade Pay + MSP: 37400-67000 + 10000
Pre-revised Basic Pay
Revised Pay
Pay in the scale
Rank Pay
 Pay in the Pay Band
National benefit of MSP*
Total Pay in Pay Band
Grade Pay
Total Revised Pay
21400

48870
6000
54870
10000
64870
21900

50340
6000
56340
10000
66340
22400

51850
6000
57850
10000
67850
22900

53410
6000
59410
10000
69410
23400

55020
6000
61020
10000
71020
23900

56680
6000
62680
10000
72680
COL/BRIG/MAJ GEN & LT GEN TO PRESENT LT GEN PAY BAND SCALE [HAG SCALE] MAJ GEN [Equivalent to IAS HAG SCALE-1 Rs  37400-67000. Grade Pay of Rs 12000
Pre-revised scale: 22400-525-24500Revised Pay Bank PB-4 +Grade Pay + MSP: 37400-67000 + 12000
Pre-revised Basic Pay
Revised Scale
Pay in the scale
Rank Pay
 Pay in the Pay Band
National benefit of MSP*
Total Pay in Pay Band
Grade Pay
Total Revised Pay
22400
 COL
57850
6000
57850
12000
69850
22925

59410
6000
59410
12000
71410
23450
BRIG
61020
6000
61020
12000
73020
LT GEN [Equivalent to IAS HAG SCALE-1 Rs 37400-67000. Grade Pay of Rs 12000]Pre-revised scale: 22400-525-24500Revised Pay Bank PB-4 +Grade Pay + MSP: 37400-67000 + 12000
Pre-revised Basic Pay
Revised Scale
Pay in the scale
Rank Pay
 Pay in the Pay Band
National benefit of MSP*
Total Pay in Pay Band
Grade Pay
Total Revised Pay
23450

61020
6000
61020
12000
73020
23975
 MAJ GEN
62680
6000
62680
12000
74680
24500
64680
6000
64380
12000
76380
Vice Chief/AOC-in-C/DGAFMS [The Apex Pay Scale of Rs 80000 (fixed). No Grade Pay] 
Pre-revised scale: 26000 (fixed) revised scale: 80000 (Fixed)
Pre-revised Scale
Revised Scale
26000 (fixed)
80000 (fixed)
The top brass will certainly take up these anomalies with the powers that be.

Read more...

Tuesday, August 07, 2012

MY COMMMENTS ON SULEKHA ARTICLE--- fabricating history by DMR SEKHAR



ARTICLE BY DMR SEKHAR ON SULEKHA

Fabricating History – 2000 BC

  by  dmrsekhar in 

Coffeehouse

Posted on 03 Aug 2012
Fabricating History – 2000 BC

Cooking up evidence in scientific research is known though very rarely. In the recent past I came across, attempts to cook up Aryan migration/invasion theory.
The first argument that I saw (1, 2) was from one David Frawley an American with an Indian title Pandit Vamadeva Shastri supposedly given by a Hindu organization from Mumbai. Incidentally he also sports the title Dr. for his knowledge in Chinese Medicine. He argues for “Indigenous Aryans” meaning that Aryans did not migrate to India from out side but evolved within the present geographical boundaries of India. He further asserts that dark skin color of South Indians is due to excess Sun Light in South India. Then he has to answer as to why certain communities in South are fair skinned? Or why Bhils in North India are dark skinned? Vedic studies is a business for Frawley and he comes handy to Hindutva politics!
The biggest hurdle is the association of Horses with Vedic Aryans and bone analysis shows that horses entered Indus Valley Civilization only around 2000 BC. To over come this difficulty some Hindutva gentle men created  fake Indus seals (3) that depict a horse!
There are gentle men who tried to manipulate genetic studies to say that Aryans (Ancient North Indians or ANI in the terminology of Population Genetics) were living in India since 40000 years. Unfortunately the recent genetic studies say (4) otherwise that is the major mix up of ANI with ASI (Ancient South Indians, a population genetics term for Native Indian) took place around 4000 years before the present  or around 2000 BC. Also it is being reported that R1a1 gene marker that is found in some Indian castes (5) has originated in East Europe and came to India between 5200 to 2600 years back.
2000 BC is the period when IVC (Indus Valley Civilization) has collapsed. But why some people are so worried about Aryan arrival? They came and settled here long back and so what? Why these attempts to twist and fabricate evidence? We all know that scientific fraud does not stay for long!






My comments:----

Hi ,
DMR raised some good points but debate here is going at a tangent. I have been following this debate for some time, though avoided making a comment here due to my occupation with writing ON NEHRU's BLUNDERS. I am still busy with it. I thought of giving my two cents here,too whatever it's worth amongst the leading lights of professional debaters, with tons of degrees. 
You know Sekhar, why Sanskrit became a language of the elite---- because it was kept out of the reach of common man---- there was a deliberate attempt in this so as to make knowledge a sole preserve of the priestly class. Anyway, I don,t want to go into any further details because my words might hurt some people here. 
I came here to recommend to you that title of this post must be changed to FABRICATING EVIDENCE from FABRICATING HISTORY. This is what is happening because INTERNET has become the sole basis of EVIDENCE in all these discussions. Just because someone has posted a piece on the Internet it should not be the sole truth. On Internet , most of the information is a contraption of motivated argument, with sole purpose of stressing one's own line of thoughts. I think we should use some other means, too. Debate here, Shekhar ji, is like what SAINT AUGUSTENE says in VALENTINE's DEATH : Most often we argue not to convince other person but to strengthen our prejudices.
I must also point out that one study does not represent the truth because there are number of other factors which are not part of a SPECIFIC STUDY. And when we talk of Indian history, there are a number of things to be satisfied----- Genetics alone can not be the evidence---- we have to take into account, FOLK LORE ( oral history); written history ( who wrote it ) , mythology, archaeology, geography, spiritual literature ( epics and other religious material) and then connect it with SCIENTIFIC THEORIES. Sir, Science alone is not the instrument of determining the real truth. Science has its own limitations.
My own view is that scientists are blind like judiciary---- they can not see the basic truth on ground---- like judges they remain engrossed in their own isolated world. Look at the way our SC has rejected Mayawati's DA case---- NOT seeing the truth but carried away by a tech laity. Exactly,like this scientists too overlook the truth because certain things do not measure up their logic. 
Having said this let me now turn to the basic point you raised about ancient Indian history---My hypothesis is---
- firstly no one can say with authority about Indian history because it's origin remains mired in conjectures. At best there can be only hypothesis. 
Secondly, I am of the view that Aryans were ancient PIOs ( People of Indian origin) or may be even OCIs ( other country Indians) . They were neither indigenous nor they came by ARYAN iINVASION. it was a migrant community from the SUNDA LAND , called NAGAS, who went West and North at the end of last ICE AGE. It is now acknowledged that SUNDA LAND was the first Human civilisation. They had to migrate due to rising sea level around 8000 BC. SUNDA LAND was the region between present day Indian coast and Indonesia,
Thirdly, they went as for as Hungry and Germany in Europe and ancient Iran, Iraq and Syria. They established RIVER CIVILISATIONS LIKE SARASWATI RIVER. By the way, IVC, should be properly called SARASWATI RIVER CIVILISATION (SRC) as 75% of archaeological excavations are on its submerged course. 
Fourthly, around 4000-4500 BC, a major geological upheaval took place which led to disappearance of many features---- may be ATLANTIS, KUMARI KANDHAM OR LIMURIA--- banished during this period. An event something like a POLAR SHIFT , though NOT necessarily polar shif must have taken place which affected the River CIVILISATIONS. It is then thiese people started REVERSE JOURNEY. They came back as ARYANS--- refined people like NRIs of today. They spoke Sanskrit , which was written in Prakritic script--- Harappan seals establish this.
Fifthly, they first made their home in SAPTA SINDHU region called ARYAVRATA This is the region which includes, Indian and Pakistani Punjab, Haryana,parts of Rajasthan,J&K, Delhi. It is here RAMYANA WAS ENACTED. if you believe ex Surveyor General of India, Mr Rajesh Kochar, AYODHYA was in AFGHANISTAN. Also, note VALMIKI'sAshram is in RAM TIRATH , Near Amritsar in Punjab. It is here he wrote Ramayan.
Sixthly, story of Ramayan could be a fictionalised story based on BATTLE OF TEN KINGS ( Actualy 13) as described in RIGVEDA.---- it might interest you to know that MANDODRI Ravna 's wife was from a village near modern JODHPUR--- then part of SAPTA SINDHU. One must read this BATTLE OF TEN KINGS---- also called DASJANYA SANGRAM---- I had written about it some time back. May be Balmiki called Ravna ---- TEN HEADED----representing these TEN KINGS.
Now let me say a word about ARYA. It is formed from two Sanskrit roots I.e, Ri and Aa---- Ri means COMMON and Aa means NOT SO Aa + Ri= NOT COMMON or a NOBLE PERSON. It was therefore certain that ARYA was not a race but a NOBLE PERSON, educated and dignified, Not necessarily he spoke Sanskrit---- like today's NRIs---- all might not be so efficient in English like second generation or third generation Indians in Spain and Denmark or even Gemany. 
Seventhly, the natives of this region were NAGAS, who had a rich civilisation but natural calamities sent them looking for other lands---- Indian History is a case of MIGRANT POPULATIONS---- story of IMMIGRANTS----like USA today. Such a society is always, Flexible, tolerant, and forward developing. It is only when it gets ritualized that the decay begins ----- a low pressure is created and High pressure winds come in. No invasion but Migrations have characterized Indian ancient history.
Read Bhagwan S Gidwani RETURN OF THE ARYANS; Rajesh kochhar, VEDIC HISTORY OF INDIA; NS Raja Ram and David Frawley , 10000 years OF INDIAN HISTORY and Dr Saravpalli Radhakrishanan , HINDU VIEW OF LIFE. Do not read DISCOVERY OF India by JL NEHRU--- which is out rightly a western view point. You can also read INTO INDIA ans HISTORY OF INDIA by a reputed and renowned British indologist, Mr. John Keay. 
Do Not purely go by stuff posted on the internet through these isolated studies. There are many genetic studies which say different things. 
Finally a word about SANSKRIT---- Panini did not create it--- it had preexisted---- he only refined the language----- and gave written script and grammar------ if you read Bhagwan Gidwani----- most of east European languages have Sanskrit words----- so is with Avestic Zelda if you read Rajesh kochhar. Therefore , there is an assumption, that Sanskrit might have been the base and NAGAS WOULD HAVE GONE THERE AS WANDERING GYPSIES.---- today they find ROMANIAN Gypsies have similarities to Indians -----
Thanks---- do read me entirely, ponder about before you answer me---- don,t be selective and pick up sentences as is the precedence of debate here----- see it holistically ----please take no offence---- I do apologise in advance, if anything I said is offensive.
Regards
Rajee.



Read more...