THE MAKING OF OSLO-KILLER!

Oslo-killing has thrown up many questions which needs to be realistically examined. The killer is Andres Breivik---a white Norwegian and a Christian. Eye-brows are being raised as to how a Christian could do this dastardly act? A large number of postmortems are under way by different experts, intelligentsia and intellectuals. Each one has one's own theory to explain as to why Andres Breivik did, what he did. Everyone is trying to get into his psyche to understand his act but no one is telling as to what had made Andres Breivik . The act of Andres Breivik is as unpardonable as any acts of 'Jihadi outfits’. There is a tendency to dismiss the likes of him as a 'maverick" or an 'insane' guy. Is he really so? Or is he the soldier of another ideology which is finding its feet against Islam?
By now, everyone knows the story of his troubled childhood, deficient of parental love and suspected connections with EDL-(English Defence League--an association of rowdy footballers!). A reference is also made to 1500 page web document he posted on the web before the incident. To put it simply, Oslo-killing is being explained as the work of a mad man---an insane, who is mentally not sound. Is that so?
The question arises as to what made Andres Breivik? Is it the fear of 'Islamisation' of the Western society and the lurking danger of its likely overwhelming of a liberalized and a free society by the diktats of Mullahs and Moulvis ? The fear is of the intolerant, regimented, inflexible, rigid and controlled tenets of Islam, which has been refereed to as 'Islamofascism'. This fear been called as 'Islamophobia'.
'Islamophobia' has given rise to a counter -ideology, which is referred to as “Cultural Conservatism". This counter ideology is nothing but an attempt to protect and secure Western culture being allegedly decimated due to liberalized western philosophy on 'Immigration', hitherto, defined as "Multiculturalism". It is no gains saying the fact that rise of 'Cultural Conservatism' is definitely promoting intolerance and hatred.
Let us put it this way: If the fear of loss of Islamic culture due to Western influence and 'globalization', aided by such thoughts as 'Pan-Islamic World View' of Islamic clergy, gave rise to " Jihadi Culture" and the rise of “Mullahs and Moulvis" in the Islamic world; similarly Islamophobia' has led to rise of "cultural conservatism" in the Western world, which is giving birth to guys like Andres Breivik----the "Jihadis" of the so called "Free World". You will notice there is a “cause-effect" phenomenon operating here.
Is this incident not a reflection of the ongoing conflict between “Pan Islamic World View” and rising head of “Cultural Conservatism” phenomenon in Europe, allegedly backed by many European Governments, such as France, Germany, Denmark etc? Is it the beginning of the 'Clash of Civilisations', as enunciated by P Huntington , an American thinker & strategist, now in full swing. Isn't this a 'War of ideologies'?
Years back, in 90-92 to be precise, when I conducted 'Operation Rhino' against ULFA (United Liberation Front of Assam) in Jorhat, I had a very interesting conversation with an ULFA ideologue, Rajan Chetia of Jorhat. Every one, including ULFA Leadership, was in awe of him. ULFA leadership, wanting to surrender asked me to first neutralize him. When he was nabbed, ULFA melted like a house of wax not only in my area but all over. We started the surrender process in Jorhat & Golaghat, which spread like wild fire all over Assam and led to creation of 'Surrendered ULFA' or SULFA, as a group, to counter ULFA.
When we apprehended him in February 1992, he held the appointment of 'General Editor' of Jorhat & Golaghat districts of Assam, something like a Political Commissar in the PLA of China. Our conversation pertained to future of ULFA due to neutralization of entire ULFA leadership by my unit in those two districts and initiation of Surrender process which had spread to all other parts of Assam. To say the least, ULFA was almost decimated and SULFA had sprung up. My conversation with Rajan Chetia ran like this:
Me: We have finished ULFA, Rajan Chetia. ( I had chided him to start the conversation because he was a die hard ULFA cadre---He was the one we had nabbed with great efforts just before suspension of Operation Rhino.. He was the master mind of abduction of UNGC officials in Jorhat)
Rajan: Sir, ideologies are never defeated by men but ideologies.
Me: Interesting Rajan. Please elaborate.
Rajan: Colonel, You might pat your back for what you have claimed to achieve---but it is not so. You might kill me but ULFA will not die----even if you eliminate Arbindo Rajkhowa and Paresh Barua, it will continue to live till you find a better ideology to defeat it. It is our ideology which has suffered a temporary setback (due to our faulty tactics and your brilliant strategy) but not finished. Sir, individuals do not matter.
Yes, he was right, I thought. To cut diamond, one needs a diamond. Therefore, to defeat an ideology, you need a 'counter- ideology'. Andres Breveik is a product of an ideology which is now engulfing not only western world but the whole world, too. The Oslo-act of Andres Breivik must be seen through the kaleidoscope of Islamophobia, which is to say:-
(a) He might have intended to kill the Palestinian students who were camping on the same island and whose camp rounded up two days before the shooting. He might have been misled or acted out of mistaken identity.
(b) His act was intended to send a warning signal to perceived inaction of 'Islamic Apologists" who continuously keep parroting such excuses as “Terrorists have No religion" or “Terrorists were Non-state actors".
Message of Andres Breivik is absolutely clear:-
(a) Religion is the mother of modern day terrorism.)Terrorists do have a religion----whether it is Islam or Christianity or whatever.
(b)Terrorists have “Patrons' , religious or political, who definitely have a 'state'.
Now the questions arise if Islamofascism and Islamophobia were real or just figment of imagination of some right wing thinkers of the west? It would be pertinent to know the feared tenets of Islam through eye-lens of an insider---the one who belongs to the said religion and how he sees it. Here are some relevant excerpts from the interview of Dr Syed Kamran Mirza, a noted Bangla Deshi thinker and the author of Roots of Islamic Terrorism and co-author of Beyond Jihad and Leaving Islam. He does say that the religion was rigid and regressive and does not allow any freedom and liberty to question its seventh century old tenets. ( Inferences are given in red. Full interview is at the link given below : http://archive.frontpagemag.com/readArticle.aspx?ARTID=33591 )
A. I learned from Mullahs/seniors that Islam is the ultimate truth and the best religion in the whole world. The Qur’an is the infallible word of Allah, who loves only the religion Islam, and all other religions are simply false and bad; they all are “Kafirs” and destined to go to hell. ( He talks about the INVINCIBILITY & INFALLIBILITY OF ISLAM----which he was brainwashed with---which actually implies that NON-BELIEVERS should be punished-----in other words, KAFIRS are not the PRODUCT of their GOD-----So, GOD is NOT ONE---)
B. Also, I learned from the Maulanas and Mullahs that—someday the entire world will be converted to Islam, by the master plan of Allah. (Intolerance and negation of the principle of Peaceful-Co-existence-----Pan Islamic World View?) .
C. The Islamist and Mullahs told me: “it is the sacred duty for the Muslims to kill kafirs. Hindus are kafirs therefore it is our duty to kill them.” I asked him if it is written in the Qur’an or hadiths to kill Hindus. The Mullah replied: yes. (Repudiating the claim of apologists that Islam was peaceful).

D. These fanatic Mullahs used to capture young Bengali girls (Mainly Hindus and also Muslims) and supply them to those Pakistani soldiers as Islamic booty (sex slaves) for their service to protecting Islam. (Theme that Religioun was puratanical/ pious is a farce----May be applicable to all religions!)

E. I also found out that Qur’an is a book full of hatred, cruelties, unethical matters and most of all it has no divinity at all. I could not find anything that was impossible for mankind to think or say in the 7th century period. The Qur’an is replete with hateful, coercive and killing verses (examples: 5:51, 9:5, 3:85, 8:39, 9:29, 47:4, 2:191).(Explodes the myth that Islam does NOT spread Hatred or Violence----This is the proof)

F. My conclusion was that this book, the Qur’an, was man made -- as other holy books that predate Islam were; and I came to the realization that the Prophet Muhammad himself primarily created it for his self-serving ( No comments--self explanatory----I hold this view for all religions on the Man-Made Gods!----God is definitely a creation of Mullahs, Pundits, Priests, 'Granthis and so on----God is ONE SUPREME BEING----nameless--formless--invisible--non-incarnating---non-discriminating)

G. It is very important to understand that Muslims in general will mostly deny that any Muslims are ever involved in Islamic terrorism around the world. Muslims in general and pure Muslims in particular will spread some awkward conspiracy theories blaming America, Israel and India about Mumbai incident.(Denial mode is in built in Islamic believers )

H. Many of them may condemn terrorism, but they do not condemn any Islamic terrorists’ gang by name and identity and they will always smell some conspiracy theory and will outright disbelieve western media. (Cry for secularism is a farce----extra-national loyalty describe islamic followers!----Duality in the conduct is visible------ wherever Muslims are in Majority ---they treat others as second rate-----if they are in 'minority' they cry for 'secularism)

J. Islamic terrorists are continuously getting a silent “nod of consent” from millions of gullible Muslims and hypocritical Islamist. Devout Muslims, (especially in Arab nations, Pakistan and elsewhere) have two-faces: to the western media, they profess to oppose terrorism, while in private, they espouse Islamic jihad, which is Islamic terrorism. (Silence of Majority of Muslims is actually a tacit approval of Jihadi acts-----Islamic followers are more “hypocrites” than accepted.)

K. But the menace may continue to grow if the West follows the fruitless policy of appeasing the Muslims, disseminating patronizing statements like: “Terrorists are not real Muslims, Islam is a religion of peace, Terrorists are a radicalized or perverted interpretation of peaceful Islam etc.” Western appeasement will be dangerous and this foolish technique of appeasing Islamist will only embolden the fanatic zeal of Islamist. Please remember, Muslims do believe strongly that Allah is working behind their ulterior plan of converting the entire earth under the fold of Islam, they call it peace or surrender. (Islamophobia is born and rise of cultural conservatism!)

Having seen dimensions of 'Islamofascism' let us see the extent of 'Islamophobia' and what do the critics of Islamisation of Europe say?

Islamisation of Europe

----In 2010 Libyan leader Gaddafi visited Italy and announced that "Islam should become the religion of the whole of Europe." He also said that Europe's conversion would become a fait accompli "when Turkey becomes a member of the European Union." -------------Soeren Kern in his piece at : http://www.hudson-ny.org/1536/islam-religion-of-europe

-------We might be in the final stages of the Islamization of Europe.This not only is a clear and present danger to the future of Europe itself, it is a threat to America and the sheer survival of the West. ----Alleges Geert Wilders, President of Freedom Party of the Netherlands .( http://www.geertwilders.nl/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1535)

---------A total of fifty-four million Muslims now live in Europe.San Diego University recently calculated that a staggering 25 percent of the population in Europe will be Muslim just 12 years from now. Bernhardt Lewis has predicted a Muslim majority by the end of this century.----Alleges Geert Wilders, President of Freedom Party of the Netherlands.

---------And the numbers would not be threatening if the Muslim-immigrants had a strong desire to assimilate. But there are few signs of that. The Pew Research Center reported that half of French Muslims see their loyalty to Islam as greater than their loyalty to France. One-third of French Muslims do not object to suicide attacks. ----Alleges Geert Wilders, President of Freedom Party of the Netherland.

What is the Grouse against Islamic immigration?

--------They do not come to integrate into our societies; they come to integrate our society into their Dar-al-Islam. ----Alleges Geert Wilders, President of Freedom Party of the Netherland.

Islam- Not a religion but a Political Ideology.

--------Let no one fool you about Islam being a religion -----in its essence, Islam is a political ideology. It is a system that lays down detailed rules for society and the life of every person. Islam wants to dictate every aspect of life.Islam means 'submission'.Islam is not compatible with freedom and democracy, because what it strives for is Sharia. ------Geert Wilders, Chairman, Party of Freedom, The Netherland, made in a speech at the Four Seasons, New York.
Demographic Upheaval
-------birth rates among native Europeans are far below replacement levels in most European countries. By contrast, Muslim immigrants in Europe are procreating at a breakneck pace, with birth rates that in many cases are double or triple those of native European populations. -----Soeren Keren.
We must note that the 'third highest community of immigrants' to Norway is from Pakistan-----Out of 4.9 million population of Norway, 12.4 % were immigrants. And Pakistan is perceived as the womb through which 'Islamic Terrorism and Pan -Islamic world View' have taken birth. These immigrants have extra national loyalty to Islam.
Everyone is skeptical of Pakistan and its military who is hand in gloves with terrorists outfits. They are using them as “strategic Assets” in Afghanistan and Kashmir. Sadly enough but it is truism that the West and USA have been the silent votary of Pakistan's transformation to a nation of Islamofascists.
It must be noted that Islam was no more seen as a religion but a political ideology. The controls and thought -regimentation by Mullahs/Moulvis, through 'Fatwas' against those who dare to question their anti-freedom edicts; Burqas for the women; Killing of KAFIRS (Non Believers); absolute superiority of Islamic God, have led to Islamophobia . In such a set up, freedom and liberty, the cutting edge of democracies, have no place.
The loyalty of the followers is more to this ideology than the nations they have settled in modern times. It is contended that the misplaced loyalty of these 'settlers' has led to the rise of 'Andres Breivik' in the West. This probably might be the cause of the rise of 'Pragya Thakurs' in India, too. 'Islamophobia' is not only real but it also threatens to make others extinct. You can not wish away this reality till Islam remains under the tight grip of Mullas and Moulvis. Anyone trying to break free of them is sidelined--like what happened to Vastanvi---ex VC of Darul Uloom of Deobandh.