Rivr » Coffeehouse » Blogs » THREE BLUNDERS OF JAWAHAR LAL NEHRU FIRST PRIME MINISTER OF INDIA PART ONE
rajee kushwaha
I am a post- graduate in Defence Management from Chennai University (University Of Madras) and trained in Media Communication and Publicity at IIMC (I... More
BLOG
THREE BLUNDERS OF JAWAHAR LAL NEHRU-- FIRST PRIME MINISTER OF INDIA---- PART ONE
by rajee kushwaha inCoffeehouse
Posted on 03 Aug 2012
Recent posts by rajee kushwaha
Dear MV Balaji, Thanks sir! You have really hit the nail on the head and I couldn't agree more with you. This aspect I was to cover under my last part in which I was to discuss NEHRU was self-possessed of his GREATNESS. he bothered more for world peace than millions of starving Indians. In the name of democracy and secularism , he created a system which is contradictory in nature----his special love for Kashmir with article 370, defeats the very purpose of equality as scripted in a ny democratic set up. He further confused it by introducing RESERVATIONS to divide the Majority community and thus create a Vote bank for self and his family. He shunted out his competitors from Congress one by one. JAI Parkash Narayan, Raja ji, Achary Kriplani were forced to part company---- Sardar Patel was done away by his death----- he was left with SLAVES and SYCHOPHANTS---- who did his bidding and this culture in Congress continues and now spread to all other political outfits. Thanks again for your views. Regards. Rajee
Rajee, tyou have forgotten the biggest blunders of Nehru, the creation of a kafkasque bureaucratic state accoutable to no one and laying the foundation for crony capitalism in the name of socialism that stifled enterprise and inventiveness helped the growth of a select few business houses. .We are still reeling under these mistakes, liberalisation or no liberalisation.
Dear Ramarao Garu,
I am gravely enamoured by your appreciation and candid views on Nehru.
It was nice to know that you had the opportunity to stand next to this towering personality of India. I too had the unique experience of shaking hand with him as a school boy in 1961 at Jallandhar in Punjab. I grew up shouting slogans of CHACHA NEHRU JINDABAD---- and overawed by his Iconic image in India. More I read him now, I think he became victim of his own arrogance and ignored correct advice of his colleagues. Unfortunately, SARKARI HISTORIANS have glamourised him more than he deserved. His vices have been whitewashed, his blunders have been warped into secrecy---- like the HENDERSON BROKS REPORT. ON 1962 DEBACLE. Even half a century , after the event , it remains a mystery---- while accusing fingers are being raised on Army and it's then Chief, General PN Thapar. It is not known by general public that GENERAL THAPAR,s pleas of Not to start war with China were ignored by Nehru- MENON combine. And when disgraced, Thapar became the scape goat.
You would be surprised to know that Nehru,s secularism was a myth. His prefix of a Pundit ji to his name was a decoy. Nehru knew that his ancestors were probably Kashmiri Muslims. He called Sheikh ABDULLA his " BLOOD BROTHER". In 1946, he went to Kashmir , despite MK GANDHI,S advice. When Gandhi told him not to go---- he said, " To me it is more important to be with my CLANS MEN than the prime ministership of India. If I have to choose between the two I will choose the former."
You must know that he was imposed as PM of India by MK Gandhi ---- In 1946, when the President of congress was to be elected, there were three candidates---- Acharya Kriplani, Sardar Patel and JL Nehru. It was evident that who ever got elected would head the interim government. Congress executive committee and Pradesh congress committees were to vote for it. There were total of 19 votes. Sardar Patel got 12, Kriplani got seven and Nehru got NONE. But Gandhi over ruled the election and declared that JL NEHRU be elected instead. Ultimately, Kriplani and Sardar Patel withdrew and Nehru was nominated.
MK GANDHI's blind love for Nehru is though inexplicable but it stands to logic that he was under gratitude of MOTI LAL Nehru and he wanted to repay the favor. Gandhi,s reason for appointing Nehru as PM were 1. Western education and best person to negotiate with Britain 2. Sardar Patel could serve under Nehru but Nehru won' serve under Patel because of his SUPRIORITY COMPLEX.
India is a case of abundance of DHRITRASHTRAS and BHISHAMPITAMAHs in its history. This was another case when Gandhi was behaving nothing more than DHRITRASHTRA and his close Lieutenants like Sardar Patel, Acharya Kriplani, Rajagopalachari, Jayparkash Narain Rai and others as BHISHAMPITAMAHs. Nehru cleverly got them sidelined and became the unquestioned leader of Congress after MK GANDHI. He finished competition and created an army do sycophants and slaves in the congress---- so the culture continues.
Read my Part Two and Parts Three & Four. Part two is already posted.
Thanks.
Regards.
Rajee.
I am gravely enamoured by your appreciation and candid views on Nehru.
It was nice to know that you had the opportunity to stand next to this towering personality of India. I too had the unique experience of shaking hand with him as a school boy in 1961 at Jallandhar in Punjab. I grew up shouting slogans of CHACHA NEHRU JINDABAD---- and overawed by his Iconic image in India. More I read him now, I think he became victim of his own arrogance and ignored correct advice of his colleagues. Unfortunately, SARKARI HISTORIANS have glamourised him more than he deserved. His vices have been whitewashed, his blunders have been warped into secrecy---- like the HENDERSON BROKS REPORT. ON 1962 DEBACLE. Even half a century , after the event , it remains a mystery---- while accusing fingers are being raised on Army and it's then Chief, General PN Thapar. It is not known by general public that GENERAL THAPAR,s pleas of Not to start war with China were ignored by Nehru- MENON combine. And when disgraced, Thapar became the scape goat.
You would be surprised to know that Nehru,s secularism was a myth. His prefix of a Pundit ji to his name was a decoy. Nehru knew that his ancestors were probably Kashmiri Muslims. He called Sheikh ABDULLA his " BLOOD BROTHER". In 1946, he went to Kashmir , despite MK GANDHI,S advice. When Gandhi told him not to go---- he said, " To me it is more important to be with my CLANS MEN than the prime ministership of India. If I have to choose between the two I will choose the former."
You must know that he was imposed as PM of India by MK Gandhi ---- In 1946, when the President of congress was to be elected, there were three candidates---- Acharya Kriplani, Sardar Patel and JL Nehru. It was evident that who ever got elected would head the interim government. Congress executive committee and Pradesh congress committees were to vote for it. There were total of 19 votes. Sardar Patel got 12, Kriplani got seven and Nehru got NONE. But Gandhi over ruled the election and declared that JL NEHRU be elected instead. Ultimately, Kriplani and Sardar Patel withdrew and Nehru was nominated.
MK GANDHI's blind love for Nehru is though inexplicable but it stands to logic that he was under gratitude of MOTI LAL Nehru and he wanted to repay the favor. Gandhi,s reason for appointing Nehru as PM were 1. Western education and best person to negotiate with Britain 2. Sardar Patel could serve under Nehru but Nehru won' serve under Patel because of his SUPRIORITY COMPLEX.
India is a case of abundance of DHRITRASHTRAS and BHISHAMPITAMAHs in its history. This was another case when Gandhi was behaving nothing more than DHRITRASHTRA and his close Lieutenants like Sardar Patel, Acharya Kriplani, Rajagopalachari, Jayparkash Narain Rai and others as BHISHAMPITAMAHs. Nehru cleverly got them sidelined and became the unquestioned leader of Congress after MK GANDHI. He finished competition and created an army do sycophants and slaves in the congress---- so the culture continues.
Read my Part Two and Parts Three & Four. Part two is already posted.
Thanks.
Regards.
Rajee.
My dear Rajee,
I commend you for writing this article.
First, your thinking was completely out of the box.
Second, you seem to have done quite a bit of research.
Third, India as a young nation needed a leader to be created for the masses to adulate. Nehru was a creation of the media. In 1965 and 1971 wars some soldiers were created and PVCs were awarded to them to create some wartime heroes.
Nehru had an aristocratic bearing and some personal charisma. I had the good fortune of standing next to him for a few minutes, and believe you me I felt ecstatic. Such was the hero worship for the man. During my study of the Indian History, he fell by several notches in my estimate. Later the Gandhi dynasty brought immense pain to the nation and body politic of the country.
Now historians are able to look at things in an objective way and realize what Nehru and his family had done to the country. Even today, people are clamoring for Rahul who is a political neophyte.
Such is the state of India. I could go on and on but I have few guests and stopping here.
With best wishes, RRG.
I commend you for writing this article.
First, your thinking was completely out of the box.
Second, you seem to have done quite a bit of research.
Third, India as a young nation needed a leader to be created for the masses to adulate. Nehru was a creation of the media. In 1965 and 1971 wars some soldiers were created and PVCs were awarded to them to create some wartime heroes.
Nehru had an aristocratic bearing and some personal charisma. I had the good fortune of standing next to him for a few minutes, and believe you me I felt ecstatic. Such was the hero worship for the man. During my study of the Indian History, he fell by several notches in my estimate. Later the Gandhi dynasty brought immense pain to the nation and body politic of the country.
Now historians are able to look at things in an objective way and realize what Nehru and his family had done to the country. Even today, people are clamoring for Rahul who is a political neophyte.
Such is the state of India. I could go on and on but I have few guests and stopping here.
With best wishes, RRG.
Dear VSG Sir,
Your point regarding Gandhi goaded election of Nehru as congress president. It happened in 1946 ------ I tried to find some notes of that period but unfortunate.y, everything of Nehru era is wrapped in mystery and secrecy----- however I could lay hand on an article by CLAUDE ARPI, Noted journalist and indologist cum expert on Kashmir and Tibet. Here is what he says on the subject :-----
"---------Everything started in early 1946 when the Indian National Congress had to elect a new president. It was an accepted fact that the leader chosen as Congress president would become the first prime minister of independent India. Three candidates were in the race: Acharya Kripalani, Jawaharlal Nehru, and Sardar Patel. The working committee of the INC and the pradesh committees had to send their nomination for one of the three candidates.
Sardar Patel was easily the most popular. Everyone knew his efficiency and his toughness for tackling difficult problems. Twelve out of 19 Pradesh committees nominated him. None nominated Nehru.
From the start Gandhi had indicated that he favoured Nehru. His reasoning was that his British education was an asset: 'Jawaharlal cannot be replaced today whilst the charge is being taken from the British. He, a Harrow boy, a Cambridge graduate, and a barrister, is wanted to carry on the negotiations with the Englishmen.'
Another point Gandhi made was that while Sardar Patel would agree to work as Nehru's deputy, the reverse might not happen. He also felt that Nehru was better known abroad and could help India play a role in international affairs.
Eventually, in deference to Gandhi, Kripalani nominated Nehru and withdrew from the race. Patel had no choice but to follow his colleague 'so that Nehru could be elected unopposed.' Dr Rajendra Prasad later stated: 'Gandhi has once again sacrificed his trusted lieutenant for the sake of the glamorous Nehru.'-------"
You can read him here-----http://www.rediff.com/news/2004/jun/16spec3.htm
It is a very interesting article and it does show Nehru on a very poor light on Kashmir and how MAHARAJA HARI SINGH was shunned by Nehru to favor his " Blood brother" , Sheikh Abdulla and thus forcing the Maharaja to goose the path of independence. It would be interesting to note that Sardar Patel had resigned on Nehru going to UNO on Kashmir issue but Gandhi prevented him.
Regards.
Rajee
Your point regarding Gandhi goaded election of Nehru as congress president. It happened in 1946 ------ I tried to find some notes of that period but unfortunate.y, everything of Nehru era is wrapped in mystery and secrecy----- however I could lay hand on an article by CLAUDE ARPI, Noted journalist and indologist cum expert on Kashmir and Tibet. Here is what he says on the subject :-----
"---------Everything started in early 1946 when the Indian National Congress had to elect a new president. It was an accepted fact that the leader chosen as Congress president would become the first prime minister of independent India. Three candidates were in the race: Acharya Kripalani, Jawaharlal Nehru, and Sardar Patel. The working committee of the INC and the pradesh committees had to send their nomination for one of the three candidates.
Sardar Patel was easily the most popular. Everyone knew his efficiency and his toughness for tackling difficult problems. Twelve out of 19 Pradesh committees nominated him. None nominated Nehru.
From the start Gandhi had indicated that he favoured Nehru. His reasoning was that his British education was an asset: 'Jawaharlal cannot be replaced today whilst the charge is being taken from the British. He, a Harrow boy, a Cambridge graduate, and a barrister, is wanted to carry on the negotiations with the Englishmen.'
Another point Gandhi made was that while Sardar Patel would agree to work as Nehru's deputy, the reverse might not happen. He also felt that Nehru was better known abroad and could help India play a role in international affairs.
Eventually, in deference to Gandhi, Kripalani nominated Nehru and withdrew from the race. Patel had no choice but to follow his colleague 'so that Nehru could be elected unopposed.' Dr Rajendra Prasad later stated: 'Gandhi has once again sacrificed his trusted lieutenant for the sake of the glamorous Nehru.'-------"
You can read him here-----http://www.rediff.com/news/2004/jun/16spec3.htm
It is a very interesting article and it does show Nehru on a very poor light on Kashmir and how MAHARAJA HARI SINGH was shunned by Nehru to favor his " Blood brother" , Sheikh Abdulla and thus forcing the Maharaja to goose the path of independence. It would be interesting to note that Sardar Patel had resigned on Nehru going to UNO on Kashmir issue but Gandhi prevented him.
Regards.
Rajee
Dear Subbu,
Thanks a lot for this---- I was coming to it when I was to deal with BLUNDER ABOUT TIBET. Yes, points mentionedin the Pioneer article are correct. In fact his biggest blunder was to ignore Sardar Patel 's letter of November 07, 1950, where he had warned Nehru of China,s future intentions. Nehru,s major errors on Tibet can be categorized under five heads-----1. Reposing unwanted trust in Chinese leadership. 2. Allowing Chinese Suzeranity over Tibet. 3. Not resolving border issue with China after Tibet was recognized as part of China. 4. Ordering army to EVICT China from forward posts in NEFA hoping that china won,t react. 5. Double policy on Tibet---- recognizing it as part of China, then giving asylum to Dalai Lama. Regards. Rajee.
Thanks a lot for this---- I was coming to it when I was to deal with BLUNDER ABOUT TIBET. Yes, points mentionedin the Pioneer article are correct. In fact his biggest blunder was to ignore Sardar Patel 's letter of November 07, 1950, where he had warned Nehru of China,s future intentions. Nehru,s major errors on Tibet can be categorized under five heads-----1. Reposing unwanted trust in Chinese leadership. 2. Allowing Chinese Suzeranity over Tibet. 3. Not resolving border issue with China after Tibet was recognized as part of China. 4. Ordering army to EVICT China from forward posts in NEFA hoping that china won,t react. 5. Double policy on Tibet---- recognizing it as part of China, then giving asylum to Dalai Lama. Regards. Rajee.
Dear RAJAH IYER,
Thanks a lot. All the points you have brought out speak the real truth of history which is being kept wrapped up Nehruvian Historians---- particularly leftist historians of JL NEHRU University. I am indebted to you for your candid views on this subject. Do wait for my other parts to this blog. Thanks.
Regards.
Rajee.
Thanks a lot. All the points you have brought out speak the real truth of history which is being kept wrapped up Nehruvian Historians---- particularly leftist historians of JL NEHRU University. I am indebted to you for your candid views on this subject. Do wait for my other parts to this blog. Thanks.
Regards.
Rajee.
Dear Gopalakrishanan,
I o agree with you but NEHRU could have avoided these blunders and moulded this infant polity into a solid nation of great strength----- but he rather chose to project his own greatness at India,s expanse. His daughter was power hungry but she did work in the interest of India.
Nehru is the founding father of DYNASTOCRACY in India. His PANCHSHEEL mantra was his attempt to be recognized as an APOSTLE of PEACE.
He made Indra president of Congress in 1959, at the head many a stalwarts---- thus father - daughter duo controlled the Government and the party and turned into a party of Sycophants and slaves---- which is so even today.
He did not disband congress even when Gandhi had advised because his power rested in a muted congress while competitors were edged out.
Regards.
Rajee.
I o agree with you but NEHRU could have avoided these blunders and moulded this infant polity into a solid nation of great strength----- but he rather chose to project his own greatness at India,s expanse. His daughter was power hungry but she did work in the interest of India.
Nehru is the founding father of DYNASTOCRACY in India. His PANCHSHEEL mantra was his attempt to be recognized as an APOSTLE of PEACE.
He made Indra president of Congress in 1959, at the head many a stalwarts---- thus father - daughter duo controlled the Government and the party and turned into a party of Sycophants and slaves---- which is so even today.
He did not disband congress even when Gandhi had advised because his power rested in a muted congress while competitors were edged out.
Regards.
Rajee.
Dear UNNI,
thanks a lot for your candid views. Yes, SC Bose was heels and head above Nehru but Gandhi did not like him.
So was even Sardar Patel---- he too was sidelined. Unfortunately, MK Gandhi was surrounded by many BHISHAMPITAMAHs who kept silent when he projected Nehru due to his personal obligation to Moti Lal.
Regards.
Rajee
thanks a lot for your candid views. Yes, SC Bose was heels and head above Nehru but Gandhi did not like him.
So was even Sardar Patel---- he too was sidelined. Unfortunately, MK Gandhi was surrounded by many BHISHAMPITAMAHs who kept silent when he projected Nehru due to his personal obligation to Moti Lal.
Regards.
Rajee
Dear NKR,
welcome here---- I am enamoured by your informed views. Yes, Indra was a turning point in post independent history. But her rise to power is attribute to Nehru----not as a chance but a well planned strategy. At the young age of 40 years, she was made the President of Congress in 1959---- at the head of many a stalwarts----- who had been sidelined or kicked out to make way for her. Some names like Raja gopalachari, Acharya Kriplani, JAI Prakash Narain and many others were made to leave congress.
I agree history is an evolving process. But as I told DMR Sekhar, I repeat here---- we are NOT writing history but EVALUATING history and putting certain aspects in correct perspective. I agree too with the view that Nehru did not make these mistakes intentionally----- but mistakes he made----these were grave errors against the advice rendered to him---- which as a head of a democratic state, he had to accept it.
He was so possessed of his greatness that he even did not care for then President,s advice---- Dr Rajendra Prasad was against the conditional accession of Kashmir---- which was surprisingly not demanded by Maharaja but granted by Nehru on MOUNTBATTEN's advice. So, Nehru has to take blame for its consequences.
Do read other parts and offer your views.
Regards.
Rajee.
welcome here---- I am enamoured by your informed views. Yes, Indra was a turning point in post independent history. But her rise to power is attribute to Nehru----not as a chance but a well planned strategy. At the young age of 40 years, she was made the President of Congress in 1959---- at the head of many a stalwarts----- who had been sidelined or kicked out to make way for her. Some names like Raja gopalachari, Acharya Kriplani, JAI Prakash Narain and many others were made to leave congress.
I agree history is an evolving process. But as I told DMR Sekhar, I repeat here---- we are NOT writing history but EVALUATING history and putting certain aspects in correct perspective. I agree too with the view that Nehru did not make these mistakes intentionally----- but mistakes he made----these were grave errors against the advice rendered to him---- which as a head of a democratic state, he had to accept it.
He was so possessed of his greatness that he even did not care for then President,s advice---- Dr Rajendra Prasad was against the conditional accession of Kashmir---- which was surprisingly not demanded by Maharaja but granted by Nehru on MOUNTBATTEN's advice. So, Nehru has to take blame for its consequences.
Do read other parts and offer your views.
Regards.
Rajee.
Dear Sekhar ji,
Thanks for coming. You are absolutely right, there is always one spot on top of a pyramidical structure. But Nehru was propelled to be there through Gandhian Manipulations and not because of his merit.
Educated and groomed in western thoughts, he was not suited to understand the ground situation in India. Further he was possessed of his greatness and suffered from self- righteousness.
Out of 65 years of Independence, Nehru' Congress has ruled for almost 55 years---- therefore maximum blame has to go to Congress on all the ills still afflicting us. Besides, Nehru was the longest serving PM of an infant called India--- he was the right person to have moulded it the way it was in the best interests of India---- but he remained busy only in his dreams of world leadership---- till Mao tse stung smashed it in 1962. His follies on Kashmir are unpardonable as is the provision for article 370 and separate rules for separate communities-----
You see SEKHAR, the leader has to take the blame for anything going wrong---- so, it goes to Nehru. We are evaluatiing history now not rewriting.
Regards.
Rajee.
Thanks for coming. You are absolutely right, there is always one spot on top of a pyramidical structure. But Nehru was propelled to be there through Gandhian Manipulations and not because of his merit.
Educated and groomed in western thoughts, he was not suited to understand the ground situation in India. Further he was possessed of his greatness and suffered from self- righteousness.
Out of 65 years of Independence, Nehru' Congress has ruled for almost 55 years---- therefore maximum blame has to go to Congress on all the ills still afflicting us. Besides, Nehru was the longest serving PM of an infant called India--- he was the right person to have moulded it the way it was in the best interests of India---- but he remained busy only in his dreams of world leadership---- till Mao tse stung smashed it in 1962. His follies on Kashmir are unpardonable as is the provision for article 370 and separate rules for separate communities-----
You see SEKHAR, the leader has to take the blame for anything going wrong---- so, it goes to Nehru. We are evaluatiing history now not rewriting.
Regards.
Rajee.
Dear VSG Sir,
Thanks a lot for your informed views. I am trying to locate the proceedings of CWC meet, even I had heard this and I wanted to include this in my last part of this blog. I would give you the reference.
Nehru was propelled into greatness because there were too many BHISHAMPITAMAHS in the congress then, who prefered to keep silent when Gandhi hoisted him on the CWC ----- some of them later resented the decision---- Nehru called the guys like RAJA JI as mad dog because they objected to his Kashmir and Tibet stance.
Nehru was too possessed of his self acclaimed Greatness that he had no time for India. His PANCHSHEEL MANTRA was overhyped idea, which was better used by China to make peace with India while it dealt with USA.
In most of the cabinet meetings , he never listened to his colleagues and did doodling while others spoke. He always had preconceived ideas on issues, mostly generated by Mountbatten,s thoughts.
I do recognize his contributions but, he was Not pragmatic, he lived in his dreams and by his Wester education. He foisted certain ideologies on India which were not suitable for subcontinental society. We needed democracy but with a modification till people had matured----- he unleashed free for all DEMONOCRACY ---- sowed the seeds of DYNASTOCRACY in India, which has become monstrous.
Regards.
Rajee
Thanks a lot for your informed views. I am trying to locate the proceedings of CWC meet, even I had heard this and I wanted to include this in my last part of this blog. I would give you the reference.
Nehru was propelled into greatness because there were too many BHISHAMPITAMAHS in the congress then, who prefered to keep silent when Gandhi hoisted him on the CWC ----- some of them later resented the decision---- Nehru called the guys like RAJA JI as mad dog because they objected to his Kashmir and Tibet stance.
Nehru was too possessed of his self acclaimed Greatness that he had no time for India. His PANCHSHEEL MANTRA was overhyped idea, which was better used by China to make peace with India while it dealt with USA.
In most of the cabinet meetings , he never listened to his colleagues and did doodling while others spoke. He always had preconceived ideas on issues, mostly generated by Mountbatten,s thoughts.
I do recognize his contributions but, he was Not pragmatic, he lived in his dreams and by his Wester education. He foisted certain ideologies on India which were not suitable for subcontinental society. We needed democracy but with a modification till people had matured----- he unleashed free for all DEMONOCRACY ---- sowed the seeds of DYNASTOCRACY in India, which has become monstrous.
Regards.
Rajee
Dear Avinasjee,
Welcome, I am very happy that you have come in. It gives me great pleasure that your father had the same views. A great scholar, as he was, he couldnot have been wrong and I think he knew and understood contemporary events better than a guy like me.
I would like to have your views on the other parts, where Ideal with each blunder one by one.
Thanks a lot. How's Nagpur doing?
Regards.
Rajee
Welcome, I am very happy that you have come in. It gives me great pleasure that your father had the same views. A great scholar, as he was, he couldnot have been wrong and I think he knew and understood contemporary events better than a guy like me.
I would like to have your views on the other parts, where Ideal with each blunder one by one.
Thanks a lot. How's Nagpur doing?
Regards.
Rajee
Dear Hillol,
Thanks for coming and making very valid points. I now feel that the story of SC Bose's death might be an orchestrated story. There are some photographs whic a person like SC Bose near the death bed of Nehru in 1964. Only query in my mind is : why would Bose like to be in shadows unless kept in confinement in Siberia---- many people do talk about this.
As for as Nehru is concerned, I think he cared less for India but for his own image and family. You see by 1951, all other top leaders of freedom were nullified either through death or other means---- some names, Rajagopalchari, JAI Prakash, Achary Kriplani were sidelined---- Gandhi,Patel had died-----Jinnah had been shunted out to Pakistan----- Nehru was left alone to control congress which was by then a conglomeration of his slaves.----- thus Indian history was manipulated to project him as the biggest leaders.
The leaders of Congress in 1966 made the same mistake by picking up Indra Gandhi but Zail Singh made in 1984 and Sita ram Kesri did in 1996. Congress is a party of Nehry family slaves and sycophants.
Regards.
Rajee.
Thanks for coming and making very valid points. I now feel that the story of SC Bose's death might be an orchestrated story. There are some photographs whic a person like SC Bose near the death bed of Nehru in 1964. Only query in my mind is : why would Bose like to be in shadows unless kept in confinement in Siberia---- many people do talk about this.
As for as Nehru is concerned, I think he cared less for India but for his own image and family. You see by 1951, all other top leaders of freedom were nullified either through death or other means---- some names, Rajagopalchari, JAI Prakash, Achary Kriplani were sidelined---- Gandhi,Patel had died-----Jinnah had been shunted out to Pakistan----- Nehru was left alone to control congress which was by then a conglomeration of his slaves.----- thus Indian history was manipulated to project him as the biggest leaders.
The leaders of Congress in 1966 made the same mistake by picking up Indra Gandhi but Zail Singh made in 1984 and Sita ram Kesri did in 1996. Congress is a party of Nehry family slaves and sycophants.
Regards.
Rajee.
Rajeeji,
More than Nehru, it was his daughter Indira did more damage to the Nation. The fourth blunder of Nehru was to introduce Dynastic Politics in India. you have missed out that. I always say, "By giving away Anand Bhavan, Nehru has taken the possession of the country!" What we learn from history is, "we dont learn from history!"
regards,
Gopalakrishnan
More than Nehru, it was his daughter Indira did more damage to the Nation. The fourth blunder of Nehru was to introduce Dynastic Politics in India. you have missed out that. I always say, "By giving away Anand Bhavan, Nehru has taken the possession of the country!" What we learn from history is, "we dont learn from history!"
regards,
Gopalakrishnan
Dear Rajee sir,
Nehru was influenced by many factors and personalities,and that's well documented.
Motilal influencing Gandhi and Sardar Patel winning at the CWC are good information.
Subash Chandra Bose was a threat both to Nehru and the British alike.
waiting for the other parts.
kind regards
unni
Nehru was influenced by many factors and personalities,and that's well documented.
Motilal influencing Gandhi and Sardar Patel winning at the CWC are good information.
Subash Chandra Bose was a threat both to Nehru and the British alike.
waiting for the other parts.
kind regards
unni
No comments:
Post a Comment