MURKY POLITICS OF INDIA----- FOREIGN AGENTS AND INTERVENTION.
Two days back, after his return from India visit, BH Obama, President of USA made a very casual statement on religious intolerance in India. He had done so, even , while in India. One wonders, if Sheetla Tiestawad was his advisor on religious tolerance in India! But, as soon as he did it, Indian Media, particularly foreign controlled English News media, both electronic and print, lapped up the story to do their favorite "Modi- Bashing". Every one and anyone of who's who of Indian media and also politics started castigating the union government. It seemed as if it was almost synchronized and pre - planned with the Indian media, though it would be far stretching the argument.
Why did Obama make this India - specific observation? Was this reaction of Obama to some statements and actions by Hindu organizations, like "Ghar BAPISI" ( Home Return) or 'India - is- a- HIndu Nation- statement' by RSS Chief? How does he ignore the raging noise of " Islamophobia" in Western world, even if it was as a reaction to Islamic Terrorism? Is't it religious intolerance by Christians of Europe? If Islamophobia is accepted as a reaction to Islamic Terrorism, why call assertion by Hindu Majority in India as intolerance?
Can a Muslim or a Hindu become President of USA? Can a Muslim become Prime Minister of Israel? Can a Hindu become a ruler in a Muslim or a Christian majority Nation? Is this practice an example of religious tolerance or intolerance? Contrary to this, India has had MuslIms and Sikhs as Presidents and Prime Minister. Unfortunately, Obama forgot about the New York Bishop who, two years back, had threatened to burn all the mosques in USA. He forgot about his own case of racial discrimination, which he faced in his growing years.
Why was he then, pontificating India? He might not be though in the picture frame but there is a framework of foreign intervention in India. Is there, then, some kind of a foreign conspiracy to destabilize India? Yes says, RSN Singh, an ex Raw officer , in his article POLITICAL TERRORISM TRAVELS TO INDIA in an online magazine, Canary Trap . Here is an extract of his chest thumping statement :-
"------The progenitor of this terrorism is the Western World. Earlier in the Cold War era, regime changes in target countries by the intelligence agencies like the CIA and KGB were effected by assassination of leaders, who could not be bought, blackmailed or intimidated.-----
------------As democracy proliferated, external agencies began to manipulate its very basics to cause instability in the target country for furtherance of economic, religious, social and geo-strategic agendas. These basics include the right to dissent and oppose. The dissenters or protestors are paid and prodded to go to such a limit that the State is forced to resort to ‘minimum force’ to restore order and stability. This is then exploited to cause destabilization through the paid agents. Such agents come in form of ‘Kejriwal’.----------"
While what RSN says might be based on his conjectures but doubts do rise. The conduct and actions of some parties and leaders do add weight to his arguments. In fact, the Indian media is so biased that one can easily see some kind of a conspiracy. When a Muslim priest issues a fatwa to Muslims to vote for AAP , there is no noise in the Indian Media. Statements by obscure Muslim religious heads are given prominence by media not to criticize but to influence and channelize minds of the Muslims. Look at this statement by the head of AIIA (All India Imam Association) , Maulana Mohd Sajid Rashidi. To quote him, he said : "All India Imam Association to support AAP in the Delhi elections: Maulana Mohd Sajid Rashidi,". Similarly, Maulana Abdul Bukhari, so called Shahi Imam of Jama Masjid in Delhi has made a call to Muslims to vote for AAP, though AAP claims to have rejected it. But the point is if a similar statement was made by Hindu Organisation, there would have been a lot of hue and cry. However, there is not a whimper of a noise in the media on these Imams and Maulana issuing biased directives.
There is no doubts that Indian media is controlled by their foreign investors. This is a known fact. Even the ex- Chairman of Press council, Justice Markandey Katju, has made an appeal for people to vote for AAP and he has branded BJP corrupt and communal. He is an ex judge of the Supreme Court. One would have accepted if he had advised Delhites to exercise NOTA option but how was he ignoring Muslim appeals for AAP and assuming that AAP was NOT communal. Does not he know that Arvind Kejriwal has been hobnobbing with Maulanas and Qazis? During Parliamentary elections Arvind Kejriwal had raked up a controversy by cozying up to a Muslim Priest who had announced prize for George Bush's head. How's AAP clean when forged cheques are used to convert black money into white? One fails to understand how a Supreme Court judge can ignore these facts?
Is he calling BJP communal because of Hindu assertiveness ? Has he gone into the causes of this? Weren't Hindus pushed to a corner because of wrong policies of political dispensation ruling India for 56 of the last 67 years? The tragedy is the irresponsible statements of our political leaders , particularly the Congress , over the last 10 years have split the polity into MAJORITY Vs MINORITY, nay, HINDU Vs MUSLIM.
In fact, over the last ten years or so, under the Congress rule, an impression had grown amongst the Hindu community that to call one self a "HINDU"under Congress and her cohorts rule was a "crime". You see, they openly talked of "HINDU TERROR", and when it came to "JIHADIS -Terrorist Acts", they conveniently state that "TERRORISM" has no "RELIGION". This was open appeasement and favoritism by rulers and leaders. This is what led to majority assertiveness, where even caste ridden states like UP and Bihar , too, who always voted for their caste , turned against such leaders and voted ENMASSE for the BJP and NARENDER MODI.
And if you believe RSN Singh, he must have got his valid reasons, it seems Arvind Kejriwal is a Congress, nay, Sonia Gandhi creation. His far fetching arguments , though, even suggest that there might be a conspiracy to deactivate Congress in its present form and recreate in its AAP avatar because present congress has many a scams and scandals to its name. He also sees media hand in all this murky politics of Delhi Elections to ensure AAP victory, as desired by their foreign masters. He says :--
"--------In the run-up to Delhi Assembly elections, one senior journalist of a TV channel is believed to have said in an editorial meeting that Kejriwal’s victory has to be ensured by hook or by crook in order to save democracy. Regular news TV viewers can easily decipher this channel, as it is now not even pretending to be a news channel but a political propaganda machine for Kejriwal. Some of the other subverted channels are little more guarded. These are the same channels, which in run-up to the Lok Sabha elections constantly bombarded the audience with the photographs and questions as to who would be next Prime Minister – Rahul, Modi or Kejriwal? It was another matter that Kejriwal’s party was not in the wildest calculus. The moot question is that a party, which enjoys the support of ‘Aam Aadmi’, why should it resort to funding from abroad?------"
This article is worth a read to understand what is going on in the churning process of Indian politics. There is definitely an involvement of foreign money in a big way, particularly from Euorope, Middle East and Saudi Arabia. You do not need rocket science knowledge to know as to who were the beneficiaries of this money in India. Pitching, 'Minority ' against the ' Majority' is with a definite aim of destabilizing India. Unfortunately, short sighted Indian politicians, particularly, regional and caste satraps , can not see beyond their nose. And they make Indian politics more murky and stinking with their personal agendas at the cost of national security and interests.
No comments:
Post a Comment