FAKE ENCOUNTER: TRUTH AND LIES OF ISHARAT JAHAN CASE!
A raging controversy has engulfed the nation, over the last few days, whether killing of Isharat Jahan and three other persons by Gujarat Police in 2004, was a fake encounter or a genuine one? The line of arguments turning it "Fake", deliberately overlooks and ignores the fact that when there was a war, enemy soldiers were ought to be killed. If it was not done then, your own soldiers jeopardize their own lives because enemy soldiers won't give them a chance.
O' India! Shed some tears for Lt Kalia of Kargil -99 war fame! How was he treated by the enemy? Eyes gouged out; Genetals cut and the body was mutilated out of shape. India only huffed and puffed but nothing else it could do to Pakistan. On the other hand Pakistan's two IRREGULAR SOLDIERS are killed inside Indian territory with two Indian fifth columnists. Lo! Some Indian politicians and "secularists" are crying foul and say that it was a fake encounter. These secularists and politicians have, though, different personal motives hidden in this Fake Encounter Theory. The issue is not whether the method of neutralisation of IRREGULAR SOLDIERS of the enemy was fake or genuine but whether terrorists were Fake or real Enemies of India!
The constitution of India clearly defines as to who was to be treated as enemy. It says that anyone, whether citizen or a foreigner, who picks up arms against the Indian state or indulges in a conspiracy to undermine its integrity and security was to be treated as enemy of the nation. There are NO moral strings attached to it. When the integrity and security of the nation was concerned, human rights have NO place. Don't they say everything is fair in love and war.
The shouts and loud cries of a fake encounter of Ishrat Jahan is a very weak ploy to mask political intrigues. Judges who buy this theory would be going against the very constitution of India, which they are entrusted to uphold. It is painfully noted that FAKE ENCOUNTER THEORY was not to show concern for the Humsn rights of Isharat Jahan and her cohorts but part of a sinister design to eliminate political adversary through a misguided and misdirected judicial process by manipulating the instruments of the state, while in power.
Facts of Isharat Jahan now being revealed indicate that Isharat Jahan was NOT an Innocent Indian citizen. She was part of an Organisation fighting Proxy war against India. Her innocence gets blown to the winds when one asks oneself as to what was she doing with two LeT operatives, who were gunned down along with her. In his interrogation, David Headley claims that she was trained as a Human bomb by LeT. A UN document says that she was member of a terrorist Organisation , fighting proxy war against India. The interrogation report of David Headley by NIA officer , Mr. Behera, paints her as part of a LeT module. Then where is the question of her Human rights and innocence.? Even LeT website had initially claimed her as its operative, which was immediately noted by Indian intelligence agencies and brought to the knowledge of then government. How can , then, her elimination be treated as Fake?
The only fact is that four "IRREGULAR SOLDIERS" of the enemy, in the shape of Isharat Jahan , Javed and their two Pakistani collaborators, as determined by Indian Constitution , was done away with. There are NO violations of Human rights when enemy soldiers are killed in a war. It is as simple and straight. Indian judiciary and Indial lawyers harping about human rights and fake encounter ought to know the nuisance of modern day war, being pursued by Pakistan against India. It is called WOM (War by Other Means).Terrorist organizations raised and sponsored by it are their Irregular Soldiers' cleverly waging war against India through indirect means. To neutralize such irregular Soldiers of the enemy can not be termed as Fake. I am sure, Munish Tiwari and Randeep Surjewala of Congress's are not so ignorant about these inferences. If so, then, it is sad reflection of the people who ruled India for 55 years out of 68.
It is now known that first affidavit, filed by the government in the courts, which spoke of Isharat Jahan as part of a LeT module, was changed with the full knowledge of the powers that be. It does smack of an ulterior motive by the person who did it. The change has political and national security overtones. I have NO intentions of dissecting political intentions but would like to question this decision with national security in mind.
By accusing security forces and intelligence agencies, who eliminated the four LeT operatives, the morale of the forces was undermined. If the government's of the day, treat their soldiers like this, who would take risks to provide you internal security? This was a genuine case but at times genuine mistakes do occur, would the authorities say , " Go face the Music"? In the GAME OF THE FOXES, all kind of dirty tricks are employed the world over. There are NO moral strings tied on your intelligence agencies. In the instant case, INTELLIGENCE BUREAU was not only put under the scanner but it was pitted against CBI, Putting different organs of the state on a platform where both were baying for each other's blood is an anti -dose of National Security.
The deliberate act to paint Isharat Jahan and her three cohorts as Innocents, made National Security apparatus of India a laughing stock in the rest of the world. Look at the contrast what USA did when their CIA Contractor, David, cold bloodedly murdered two ISI agents in Lahore a few years back. It was an unpardonable act in a foreign country. But USA pulled all strings to take him back safely to USA. Why go, so far? Look at Pakistan. It makes mockery of all your evidences on 26/11 Mumbai Attack or more recently Pathankot Air Base Attack on 02 January 2016. It refuses to accept its involvement. All your evidences are thrown out of the window. And what India does, it exposes its own security men and tells the world, as to how high we are on the moral grounds. Why do the Indians forget the case of two Italian Marines who cold bloodedly murdered Indian fishermen. Italy refuses to send them India to face the trial.
Have we ever thought as to why world treats India like it does. it is because we are a confused nation, ruled by confused people , who have no idea of national security and its parameters. No wonder, recently, Global Times, a Chinese official mouth piece, carried an article , which stated that India was like a BEAUTIFUL WOMAN who wants to be booed by the strong men in the house , like USA and China. Worst was an observation by a CIA agent to Brigadier Yousuf Mohammed of Pakistan Army in the 1980-81, which stated that Indians are bastares who can sell their mothers for money. This has been quoted by Brig Yousuf Mohammed in this book, BEAR TRAP.
This fake encounter controversy has done much more damage to national security than Pakistan aided militancy and insurgency. So many sincere police officers and Intelligence officers have been harassed and tortured that their tales would prohibit any future officers to take risks. How can one secure a nation when it is its own enemy? Naturally, then Kirpal Singh's and Sarabjit Singh would be butchered by ISI and India would continue to harp about moralities.Who cares? Eight years back Mumbai 26/11 happened, what to say of prosecuting the culprits, Pakistan is not even accepting your evidence? Why would it, when India itself provides it excuses to doubt the credibility of the evidences furnished. Very sad state of affairs!
No comments:
Post a Comment